Monday, October 25, 2010

Ustad Amir Khan who is he?

The end of Ustad Ruler Khan in a sad move occurrence in Calcutta a few years ago has created a vitiate in the experience of Hindostani classic punishment. At the existing dimension, when there is a scarceness of much gifted artists, his decease is an irreparable diminution. Had he lived longer he would have had, at least, a symbol of fit and talented disciples to fuddle on the tradition of his gharana.
In the live 25 age many artists fuck, by their new disposition, modern prospect and fanciful faculties brought active new changes in the communication of representation of classcal punishment. Ustad Swayer Khan was much an artist. Equivalent Kumar Gandharva. Amir Khan unnoticed the age-old, stereotyped traditions, and with his tidings and talent evolved an altogether fresh communication of presentation. He also succeeded in gaining the content and credit of critics and connoisseurs.
Swayer Khan was intelligent at Indore in 1912. Punishment was in his slaying; his ancestors had been musicians in the Mughal courts. His fatherhood was an good sarangi and veena contestant. A mehfil of Ruler Khan's was e'er a dulcet receive. He had a very efficacious and attractable personality. At his concerts he would always sit in the capability of a yogi doing his tapasya, with tight eyes and unplumbed thoughtfulness. He maintained the similar job exchequer the end of his concert. His twinkly phiz, a aggregate want of gesticulation or facial distortion, his unconditioned compactness on the strain, and the decrease, gradatory build-up of a raga icon in- variably kept his conference completely enwrapped. He had, for happening but steady laya. An atmosphere of solemnity and order pervaded his con- certs, in striking counterpoint with the shrieking and sometimes un- singable gymnastic bouts many singers fuck with the tabla players that contemplate listeners with gymnastics rather than providing them with philosophy pleasure.

0 comments: